ganeshts: Running wavedrom self-hosted was quite easy - putting downloaded source code in a folder in an….RyanSmithAT: This is probably a long shot, but does anyone have a spare full-height bracket for an Intel Optane 900p/905p/P4800X….Future has cancelled CES travel for the entire company. Yeah, that's a whole lot of tech press dropping out then. RyanSmithAT: Any business emails from a Gmail domain (or other webmail host) immediately go to the trash here.RyanSmithAT: And the official name for/description of the new AMD/GloFo wafer supply agreement?.IanCutress: Every time I see someone called 'based', I auto-assume their auto-correct changed it from 'biased'.IanCutress: I immediately read that as 'biased god'.Most people are telling me 'based' means… IanCutress: That's not the definition I've been hearing.IanCutress: Welcome to the land of _predictions_.Hopefully between Brazos, Llano, and Sandy Bridge, the era of poor integrated graphics can finally come to a close. While Llano's CPU performance doesn't promise to be a substantial improvement over what we've seen here (the cores are basically K10.5), the integrated graphics should at least be a big enough boost to make it a very compelling mobile part. The E-350 beats it at every turn and even the utterly anemic GeForce 310M is a substantial improvement. Unfortunately the 3DMark tests bear out just how poorly AMD's 40-shader IGP has aged. For reference we've included the E-350's scores so you can see what bumping up to even a slower full-sized AMD notebook can get you. All of the AMD chips are more or less dwarfed by their Intel rivals, but it's not a complete bloodbath. So with that in mind, the tri-core running at 100MHz slower than the P340 in the EE34 seems like it's probably the best compromise, but the P340 doesn't put in an awful showing either. I'm confident that these scores are within the ballpark for what you could expect from the Athlon II P340, but they bear mentioning nonetheless.Ĭomparing against the other AMD processors in the lineup, the P920 is a quad-core chip running at 1.6GHz while the N830 is a tri-core chip running at 2.1GHz. The EE34 completed all our other tests perfectly fine and was nice and stable in regular use, but it bears mentioning that for the x264 results we did have to simulate the processor using a desktop Athlon II X4 with two cores disabled and the clocks adjusted. This occurred whether on the factory install or on a clean installation of Windows 7, and it's the only time we've ever seen this happen. Inheriting the K10.5 architecture from its desktop siblings, it at least offers a good bump over older K8-based chips and is capable of handling most of the tasks you're liable to throw at it.īefore we get too far in analyzing these results, it's important to note that our usual x264 benchmark refused to run on the EE34 and would always crash at exactly the same point. With that said, though, the 25W, 2.2GHz Athlon II P340 dual-core processor isn't a particularly bad chip either. These aren't bad chips, but if AMD's been struggling to play catch-up on the desktop they've been left miles behind in notebooks where power and heat become ever more important. Spare part number 616333-001 616334-001 616335-001 616336-001 616337-001 616343-001 616344-001 616345-001 616346-001 616347-001 619245-001 619246-001 619247-001 619248-001 619249-001 619250-001 620100-001ĪMD V-Series V140 Single 2.30-GHz processor (512-KB L2 cache, 1066-MHz FSB, 25W 3.2 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Athlon II N350 Dual 2.40-GHz processor (1.0-MB L2 cache, 1066-MHz FSB, 35W 3.2 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Phenom II P840 Triple 1.90-GHz processor (1.5-MB L2 cache, 1066-MHz FSB, 25W, 3.6 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Phenom II P940 Quad 1.70-GHz processor (2.0-MB L2 cache, 1066-MHz FSB, 25W, 3.6 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Turion II N550 Dual 2.60-GHz processor (2.0-MB L2 cache, 1066-MHz FSB, 35W 3.6 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Athlon II P340 Dual 2.20-GHz processor (1.0-MB L2 cache, 1066-MHz FSB, 25W 3.2 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Phenom II N640 Dual 2.90-GHz processor (2.0-MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB, 35W, 3.6 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Phenom II N850 Triple 2.20-GHz processor (1.5-MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB, 35W, 3.6 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Phenom II N950 Quad 2.10-GHz processor (2.0-MB L2 cache, 1333-MHz FSB, 35W, 3.6 gigatransfers/second) includes replacement thermal material)ĪMD Turion II P540 Dual 2.40-GHz processor (2.0-MB L2 cache, 1066-MHz FSB, 25W 3.Historically we've been pretty underwhelmed with AMD's mobile offerings, barring maybe the Turion II Neo and now Brazos.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |